Why did Arlind Qori win the debate with Blendi Fevziu about large media controlled by owners?

In the "Opinion" studio, there was a heated debate between Blendi Fevziu and Arlind Qorri.
The debate began after Qori said that the Lëvizja Bashkë Movement was censored by not being invited to the television studio, as according to him it poses a threat to the government and oligarchic businessmen. Qori accused Klan television of censorship, which met with opposition and revolt from Fevziu.
Andi Bushati has also entered the debate, and although friends with Blendi Fevziu, he agrees with Arlind Qorri as he writes:
"In this debate, I want to say that I am 100% with Arlind Qori. First, for deeply personal reasons and secondly as someone who has the privilege of seeing our media system from the inside and outside."
Bushati also writes about his personal experience and the censorship that Tv Klan has inflicted on him, saying that since 2015 he has never violated it again.
"I have been active since 1997, as a journalist, magazine editor, TV show host, and for years I have contributed as a guest to a large number of shows in these media. But after 2015, after I had a conflict with Aleksandër Frangaj, moreover not for issues related exclusively to the Klan, I have never stepped foot in this media again. None of those who invited me before had the courage to do so again. My friends, with those with whom we continued to drink coffee or a glass of wine and maintain the same relationships, were afraid to open those doors to me that I had easily entered before. Not in talk shows, not in the news, not for political conversations, anywhere. For me, suddenly, the media to whose birth I had modestly contributed, turned into the fence of a "xanun land"", writes Andi Bushati.
In his writing, Bushati takes this phenomenon beyond TV Klan as he also recalls the news reports of Top Channel, another public television station where, according to him, cases of censorship are evident and mentions them with concrete examples.
"He absurdly mentioned (he is referring to Qori) the case of Top Channel, which broadcast the prime minister personally attacking him for the pensioners' protests, but did not cover those protests at all," Bushati writes, and finally recalls the news constructed by the media on Prime Minister Rama's statuses.
"So, there is no need for more examples to show that our major media outlets have become kiosks to solve the problems of the family and financial circle of a handful of bosses. They do this in the lowest way and to the detriment of the public interest, serving the next head of state. They have reached ridiculous records, such as when it snows in Theth, they report this through the head of government's Facebook, while when a foreign magazine writes about Ksamil, it becomes news that Edi Rama has also reposted its link."